Microsoft C description: Too many open files. Check that your network system (WinSock implementation) has a utility that shows network statistics. There are several reasons for this. Developer suggestions: Did you close a socket inadvertently in one part of an application without keeping another part notified?
Developers should consider handling the referenced errors similarly. There are no QoS receivers. Is the router up and running (check by pinging it, and then ping an address on the other side of it)? The call has been canceled.
The Windows function is indicating a problem with one or more parameters. The same generic solution that was applied to the other socket methods is not appropriate for sendall(). Ah. the byte-order functions, htonl(), htons(), ntohl and ntohl(), cannot fail.
If anybody has any idea how to resolve WSAEWOULDBLOCK error please let me know. Berkeley description: The attempted operation is not supported for the type of object referenced. Any function that takes a socket as an input parameter--except close socket()--could potentially fail with this error. Socket Error 10049 This error may also result if a connection was broken due to keep-alive activity detecting a failure while one or more operations are in progress.
Question Why do I get a WSAEWOULDBLOCK error when I run my program. Socket Error 10054 WinSock functions: accept(), bind(), connect(), gethostname(), getpeername(), getsockname(), getsockopt(), recvfrom(), send(), sendto(), setsockopt() if buffer length is too small. Cannot remove a directory that is not empty. https://bobobobo.wordpress.com/2008/11/09/resolving-winsock-error-10035-wsaewouldblock/ Asynchronous sockets – Use the Windows API SetTimer().
Berkeley description: A socket operation failed because the destination host was down. Socket Error 10054 Connection Reset By Peer WSAENETUNREACH 10051 Network is unreachable. The file handle supplied is not valid. The Windows Sockets API provides access to "low-level" API's (like the transport protocols TCP and UDP), so this error is not relevant to WinSock.
Jan 27 '13 at 10:21 did you mean send() instead of socket()? (with proper parameters) –Davide Berra Jan 27 '13 at 15:50 Why are you using non-blocking More Bonuses The service cannot be found in the specified name space. Wsaewouldblock Sap This would mean having the select enclosed within gettimeofday and friends, which seems a bit overkill... What Is A Socket Error WSAEBADF (10009) Bad file descriptor.
A general QoS error. A socket already has a type (a protocol), and each sockaddr structure has an address family field to define its format. That's about one-quarter of the error values that aren't even used! A socket operation failed because the destination host is down. Socket Error 10053
You may also find the FAQ article Debugging TCP/IP useful for some less-automated methods of debugging a TCP program. You can use Wireshark’s tshark command-line companion for this instead, if available. Berkeley description: An operation was attempted on something that is not a socket. You could also try to resolve another hostname you know should work, to check that the name resolution server application is running.
So, for example, if a WinSock implementation doesn't support SOCK_RAW with IPPROTO_IP (or any other protocol), then the socket() call would fail with WSAEPROTONOSUPPORT (however, if it doesn't support SOCK_RAW at Socket Error Codes Linux This is good, because peeking often causes problems. For example, this error is returned if sendto is called with the remote address of ADDR_ANY.
WSA_QOS_BAD_OBJECT 11013 QoS bad object. WinSock description: Same as Berkeley. If the socket is currently listen()ing, it will be marked as readable if an incoming connection request has been received, so that an accept() is guaranteed to complete without blocking. Winsock Error 10061 Most of the text comes from the output from the "man errno" command on Unix.
An invalid or inconsistent flowspec was found in the QoS provider-specific buffer. Pay attention to the last phrase: 10035: WSAEWOULDBLOCK. WSA_QOS_EFILTERCOUNT 11021 Incorrect QoS filter count. An example is using a broadcast address for sendto without broadcast permission being set using setsockopt(SO_BROADCAST).
WSA_QOS_POLICY_FAILURE 11011 QoS policy failure. A connection attempt failed because the connected party did not properly respond after a period of time, or the established connection failed because the connected host has failed to respond. WinSock description: Similar to Berkeley & Microsoft C, but in reference to sockets rather than file handles (although the descriptions in the v1.1 specification say "no more file descriptors available"). Under MS-DOS versions 3.0 and later, EACCES may also indicate a locking or sharing violation.
You cannot mix and match (WINSOCK DLLs must be supplied by the same vendor that provided your underlying protocol stack). WSA_QOS_EPOLICYOBJ 11025 Invalid QoS policy object. Indeed, it’s so problematic it’s earned a place on the Lame List and in Microsoft’s Knowledge Base: see article KB192599 for specific info on the problems peeking causes with their Winsock It also occurs with functions that take a socket handle and a sockaddr structure as input parameters.
It may also make explicit mention of other functions that can fail with this error. There is the decreased portability, of course, but since there are Winsock 2 options back to Windows 95, it’s not generally a practical concern. WinSock description: Same as Berkeley. Berkeley description: A protocol was specified that does not support the semantics of the socket type requested.
Now these exceptional paths cannot be tested. For instance, even if you request to send() a few bytes of data on a newly created TCP connection, send() could fail with WSAEWOULDBLOCK (if, say, the network system has a I puzzled over this again and again. User suggestions: Check the obvious first: check that the destination address is a valid IP address.
The FormatMessage function can be used to obtain the message string for the returned error. Absolutely! A blocking operation is currently executing. Well, given the general cost of Python function calls and bytecode interpretation, it would probably not be much of a runtime overhead.